Quick Summary
You've shipped an improvement to extraction or retrieval quality and told us something we didn't know about where the system is weak First few months: You own a real surface of the ML stack.
We're signing enterprises faster than we can model their data.
Every new customer arrives with a data estate nobody has ever mapped. Undocumented tables. Columns named by someone who left in 2019. Business rules that exist only in a sales director's head. Turning that into a semantic model an agent can act on without being wrong is not a pipeline you run. It's a person deciding what correct means in an unfamiliar domain and then proving it.
You'll work on the systems that read messy enterprise data and turn it into a semantic model an agent can actually reason over. Knowledge extraction, natural language understanding, retrieval, and the evaluation that proves any of it is working.
The hard part is not calling a model. It's that "correct" is genuinely difficult to define here. A knowledge graph that looks right and is subtly wrong is worse than no graph at all, because an agent will act on it. Most of the interesting work is figuring out what correctness means for a customer's domain and then proving you hit it.
You'll be close enough to learn from all of them, and the team is small enough that nobody is going to hand you a well-scoped ticket.
If you want a research seat with a publication target, this is the wrong role. If you want clear specs and a defined lane, that's also wrong. You'll be reading unfamiliar customer data, forming your own opinion about what's broken, and shipping the fix.
We care about what you've built, not how long you've been building. Roughly two years of real production experience is the shape this usually takes, but show us the work and we'll judge the work.
- You've put an ML system into production and watched it survive contact with real data
- Strong Python and PyTorch (or TensorFlow). You write code other people can maintain
- You understand transformers, embeddings, and tokenization well enough to reason about them, not just call them
- You've worked with LLMs somewhere real: retrieval, fine-tuning, structured extraction, or evaluation
- You're suspicious of your own metrics. When a number looks good you want to know why before you celebrate
- You learn fast and out loud, and you'd rather ask a blunt question than quietly stay stuck
- You want to be near customers, not shielded from them
Send us the ML system you're proudest of shipping at caleb@zaimler.ai. Tell us how you knew it was working, and what you'd do differently now.
We value builders over résumés. If this role excites you but you don't check every box, apply anyway and show us the work.
Location & Eligibility
Listing Details
- Posted
- August 11, 2026
- First seen
- August 11, 2026
- Last seen
- August 13, 2026
Posting Health
- Days active
- 0
- Repost count
- 0
- Trust Level
- 60%
- Scored at
- August 11, 2026
Signal breakdown
Please let Zaimler know you found this job on Jobera.
3 other jobs at Zaimler
View all →Explore open roles at Zaimler.
Similar Machine Learning Engineer jobs
View all →Stay ahead of the market
Get the latest job openings, salary trends, and hiring insights delivered to your inbox every week.
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.
